Socialize / RSS

FacebookTwitterRSSMySpacePicasaFlickrLastFMLinkedInYoutubeVimeoDeliciousStumble UponDeviantartDiggFourSquare

Subscribe by Email

A Window Into the Mind of a Scientific Dictator

By Daniel Taylor – Old Thinker News –

The refinement of tyranny and control  into a science is the dream to which the 21st century scientific  dictator aspires. The study of human nature, psychology and biology aid  him in his pursuit. What you will read here is a small window into the  dark mind of a scientific dictator. In combination with  increasingly centralized power and rapidly advancing technology, the  ability of smaller and smaller groups to exercise power and effect  greater numbers of people is a real danger. C.S. Lewis wrote in 1944,  “The real picture is that of one dominant age… which resists all  previous ages most successfully… Man’s conquest of nature, if the  dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few  hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men.”

Political Ponerology

“…the  biological, psychological, moral, and economic destruction of this  majority of normal people is a “biological” necessity to the pathocrats…”

Within the field of political science  is a study called political ponerology, the study of evil applied to  politics. Every time a society falls into the hands of a brutal dictator,  nearly identical patterns can be observed. The scientific dictatorships  of today and those that may come in the future will follow in the  same vein. This is not by accident. Andrew M. Lobaczewski’s ground breaking  1998 book entitled Political Ponerology  (A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes)  discusses in depth the nature of psychopaths and  their exploits when in positions of power.

The biological, psychological, moral, and economic destruction of this majority of normal people is a “biological” necessity to the pathocrats

The image of psychopathy that Hollywood has  imposed on society is that of a crazed axe murderer, an easily  identifiable enemy. While psychopaths do sometimes manifest  themselves in this way, there is another more sophisticated type that has not received  as much attention. Psychopaths are exceptional at climbing the rungs  of power because of their lack of empathy and remorse. Back stabbing  and manipulation are done without effort, all the while putting on a  front of surprisingly convincing charm. When these individuals gain  control of corporations, government institutions and the very  foundations of society, millions of people are psychologically and  physically destroyed. Lobaczewski calls this group  the “Pathocracy”. He writes,

“Pathocracy is a disease of great social movements followed by  entire societies, nations, and empires. In the course of human  history, it has affected social, political, and religious movements  as well as the accompanying ideologies… and turned them into  caricatures of themselves. That explains why all the pathocracies of  the world are, and have been, so similar in their essential  properties”

“The following question thus suggests itself: what happens if the  network of understandings among psychopaths achieves power in  leadership positions with international exposure? This can happen,  especially during the later phases of the phenomenon. Goaded by  their character, such people thirst for just that even though it  would conflict with their own life interest… They do not understand  that a catastrophe would ensue. Germs are not aware that they  will be burned alive or buried deep in the ground along with the  human body whose death they are causing.”

“The actions of [pathocracy] affect an entire society, starting with the  leaders and infiltrating every town, business, and institution. The  pathological social structure gradually covers the entire country  creating a “new class” within that nation. This privileged class feels  permanently threatened by the “others”, i.e. by the majority of normal  people. Neither do the pathocrats entertain any illusions about their  personal fate should there be a return to the system of normal man.”

“Thus, the biological, psychological, moral, and economic destruction of  this majority of normal people is a “biological” necessity to the pathocrats. Many means serve this end, starting with concentration camps  and including warfare with an obstinate, well-armed foe who will  devastate and debilitate the human power thrown at him…”

“Any war waged by a pathocratic nation has two fronts, the internal and  the external. The internal front is more important for the leaders and  the governing elite…”

This abhorrent element of humanity seeks to spread their disease to  the wider society, because as Lebaczewski states, “normal man”  represents a grave danger to their pathological system. The scientific  dictatorship is an attempt at the “ultimate revolution“, an assurance of domination for the Pathocracy.

H. G. Wells and the Men of the  New Republic

“…They will have an ideal that will make killing  worth the while…”

The  drive for social control and eugenics was largely responsible for the  emergence and growth of the scientific study of molecular biology.  This came about when  large foundations, primarily the Rockefeller enterprises, set out in the United  States in the early 20th Century to engage in a massive research  campaign to discover the inner workings of man and in turn devise  methods of social-biological control. Thus the United States became  the  20th Century progenitor of eugenics.

The belief that  mankind’s rational and scientific control of nature will lead to a kind  of Biocratic Utopia is found throughout the writings of H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, and others. These works themselves (which have become  often cited examples of the Biocratic Utopian’s ideal world) are  based on what where present day trends in science, along with the  stated goals of the world’s elite. The “scientific dictatorship”  that Aldous Huxley spoke of is the natural modern extension to the  age old practice of tyranny.

H. G. Wells brushed shoulders  with and had intimate relationships with some of the most prominent  people of his day, including outspoken eugenicist Margaret Sanger,  Fabian socialist George Bernard Shaw, and the Huxley family. Thomas Henry Huxley, often  referred to as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his strong promotion of  Darwinian ideals, tutored H.G. Wells and taught him biology. Aldous  Huxley and Julian Huxley were T.H. Huxley’s grandsons.

As the first director general of  UNESCO, Aldous’ brother Julian Huxley wrote in the organization’s 1947 mission statement “…it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem  is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is  informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is  unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

H. G. Wells’ 1901 book   ‘Anticipations: Of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress  upon Human Life and Thought’ describes what Wells calls the “New  Republic”. In this book, Wells bluntly states the goals and  intentions of his envisioned New Republic that will, among many  other things, “…have an ideal that will make killing worth the  while,” and inflict upon deviants, “good scientifically caused pain,  that will leave nothing but a memory.” Wells even predicts the rise  of a union of European states complete with “…homologization of  laws and coinage and measures…” through which “…the final peace  of the world may be assured for ever.”

The supposed  superiority of the scientific elite, who have purified themselves of  ancient, outdated ideas and restraining morality, places them in a  position of dominance in Wells’ New Republic. The Pathocratic  mindset is clearly seen. Wells writes, “…the ethical  system of these men of the New Republic, the ethical system  which will dominate the world state, will be shaped primarily to favour the procreation of what is fine and efficient…” Death,  writes Wells, is “…the  method that must in some cases still be called in to the help of  man…”  The ethical system of the world state  will “…make killing worth the while.”

“The men of the New  Republic will not be squeamish, either, in facing or inflicting  death, because they will have a fuller sense of the  possibilities of life than we possess. They will have an ideal  that will make killing worth the while…”

Wells wrote the introduction for  Margaret Sanger’s 1922 book Pivot of Civilization, where he portrays a  hypothetical conversation between the “New civilization” and the  old. He writes that the elite cannot go on giving the gifts of  freedom, wealth and prosperity to the world if “…all our gifts to  you are to be swamped by an indiscriminate torrent of progeny.” He  continues, “…we cannot make the social life and the world-peace we  are determined to make, with the ill-bred, ill-trained swarms of  inferior citizens that you inflict upon us.”

Several decades after Wells’  Anticipations, the eugenics of America had spread overseas with  the help of the Rockefeller Foundation. The New York Times reported  on November 24th, 1936; “Rockefeller Gift Aids Reich Science.” The $655,000 grant, reports the Times, was used to build the  Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, which became the center for the Nazi  regime’s eugenics program.

George Bernard Shaw, who H.G.  Wells corresponded with frequently, praised the brutal actions  Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. In this speech, Shaw echoes the  “ethical system” of the “Men of the New Republic” that Wells penned  30 years earlier:

Suicidal Nihilists

“…these  ideas might end up essentially built into the software that runs our  society and our lives…”

As we progress into a time of  exponential development of technology, an elite within the technological  community is seeking to control humanity through  the control of technology. Computer scientist   Jaron Lanier, named in Time Magazine’s top 100  most influential people for 2010, calls this group Cybernetic totalists.  Lanier points out that this elite group may “…cause suffering for  millions of people.”   Lanier writes in his “One Half A  Manifesto”,

“There  is a real chance that evolutionary psychology, artificial  intelligence, Moore’s Law fetishizing, and the rest of the package,  will catch on in a big way, as big as Freud or Marx did in their  times. Or bigger, since these ideas might end up essentially built  into the software that runs our society and our lives. If that  happens, the ideology of cybernetic totalist intellectuals will be  amplified from novelty into a force that could cause suffering for  millions of people.”

Lanier concludes, “The  greatest crime of Marxism wasn’t simply that much of what it claimed  was false, but that it claimed to be the sole and utterly complete  path to understanding life and reality.” and, “There  is nothing more gray, stultifying, or dreary than a life lived  inside the confines of a theory. Let us hope that the cybernetic  totalists learn humility before their day in the sun arrives.”

Lanier also mentions life  extension technology, stating that the vast  majority of the population could be priced out of the technology with only a small elite having access. Lanier  himself comes across as an establishment figurehead when he proposes  that the elite keep the technology secret. This, according to  Lanier, is in an attempt to keep the  rest of the world walled off to the life-extending technologies  because there “isn’t enough room” on the planet. He  states,

“Cheap near-immortality for everyone is a self-limiting proposition.  There isn’t enough room to accommodate such an adventure… On the  other hand, expensive near immortality is something the world could  absorb, at least for a good long while, because there would be fewer  people involved. Maybe they could even keep the effort quiet.”

Arthur Kroker,  Professor of Political Science at the University  of Victoria and Director of the Pacific Centre for  Technology and Culture also identified an  abhorrent element within the technological community. “Suicidal  nihilists”, states Kroker, “…occupy the commanding heights of  digital reality…” He elaborates, “They can very happily ally  themselves with a notion of nuclear holocaust or perfect exterminism…  They’re creating again and again the exterminism of human memory,  the exterminism of human sensibility, the exterminism of  individuated human intelligence, the exterminism of human morality  itself.”

Top A.I. researcher Hugo de Garis is yet another example. In this clip he explains that the development of super-intelligent A.I. may lead to a devastating world war that could kill billions of people. He adds that he is more than willing to take the risk, saying, “As a brain builder myself, am I prepared to risk the extinction of the human species for the sake of building an artilect? … yep.”

There is a reason that our culture  is saturated with degrading imagery and self-esteem destroying  filth. Our very human fiber is being targeted. Every day more people  are coming to mirror the demoralized and decadent elite Pathocracy. This is not  by accident. In every case civilizations fall when humanity is  debased and loses touch with themselves, their neighbors and the  wider world. The worst expression of humanity and evil flows in like  a flood. Our solution lies in re-claiming our very souls and  reconnecting with humanity, turning yourself into an antibody  against the Pathocratic virus.

In the words of C.S. Lewis, writing in  his 1944 book The Abolition of Man, “…we may well thank the  beneficent obstinacy of real mothers, real nurses, and (above all)  real children for preserving the human race in such sanity as it  still possesses. But the man-moulders of the new age will be armed  with the powers of an omnicompetent state and an irresistible  scientific technique…”

One Response to A Window Into the Mind of a Scientific Dictator

  1. Joey

    April 25, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    well Daniel your words work well to bring light on targets .so with hope in the wind the great surprise awaits -the symphonies of Heaven you will hear next time on an amazing journey into the high country .continue on … be blessed ….

You must be logged in to post a comment Login