Socialize / RSS

FacebookTwitterRSSMySpacePicasaFlickrLastFMLinkedInYoutubeVimeoDeliciousStumble UponDeviantartDiggFourSquare

Subscribe by Email

Social Security – The International Mark Of The Beast

By Clint Richardson – RealityBloger –

The Global Social Security System


Did you know that over 130 countries in the world now have a Social Security Insurance program?

Did you know that Social Security is run and regulated by the United Nations and its World Bank?

Have you ever heard of the International Social Security Association (ISSA)?

And did you know that the United States Social Security Administration has international treaties and agreements through the United Nations with other countries and their Social Security Systems?

Well, its all true… But before we get into that, let’s make sure we understand just what this Social program really means, being a United States Citizen with a Social Security Number.

It is so much more than you might think…


Social Security – The Mark of the Beast


The MARK of the BEAST is upon all American Citizens!!! And the Federal Corporation named the “UNITED STATES” is that BEAST!

And the MARK of the BEAST is the NUMBER…


One of the greatest misconceptions of biblical prophesy is that the thing referenced in the Bible as the “Antichrist”, and in so many other fictional tales of said Antichrist, will some day be incarnated as a single living entity – a beast in the guise of a human – that will fool the people of Earth into loving and following that beast into a virtual hell and enslavement on Earth.

But I am here to provide you with an alternative and more realistic view. I am here to say that the biblical “Antichrist” is already upon us. It is not a single person; but a government run by and consented to by the people. It is not a living, breathing human or demon, but is instead all humans via their consent to it. It is not the devil reincarnate; but is in fact an incarnate body of legal codes that has created the Mark of the Beast through the people’s ignorance of the laws that they create. And I am here to say that it is not God that will save us from this Antichrist; but only our collective non-consent through non-participation in this system that will save us from ourselves.

If it is true that God gave men the gift and the curse of having freewill, then it must also be true that God only helps those who helps themselves…


What is the Mark of the Beast?


In TITLE 42 of U.S. CODE, entitled “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE”, we can literally find the root of this evil MARK from the BEAST called SOCIAL SECURITY. Though TITLE 42 is not statutory law, but in actuality prima facie law (consent of the governed required), the implementation of that legal code is exactly what we’d expect from the beast as the Federal UNITED STATES corporation.

So let’s have a look at Section 666 of U.S.C. TITLE 42 “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLFARE”.

Section 666 of the Social Security Act requires every state (as federal insular possessions) to obtain a persons “NUMBER” that is attached to the “NAME” of that person before such things as a license to work, drive, marry, or any other State services (privileges – not rights) are granted; of which now include Federal grants and emoluments to the states as “revenue sharing” for promotion of this enslavement via the NUMBER. In other words, a natural born citizen of the united states of America cannot work in the Federal UNITED STATES jurisdictional territory (“The Federal United States”) without being marked by the Social Security number – the number of the beast.

For those of you that don’t understand the difference between these two governments and that as citizens you are required to obey both, please read what the Supreme Court’s opinion of this fact is here:

The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights (privileges) at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has VOLUNTARILY submitted himself to such a form of government.  –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

“And behold, I swear unto you, if ye will do this, with an oath, ye shall not be destroyed; but if ye will not do this, I swear unto you with an oath, that on the morrow month I will command that my armies shall come down against you, and they shall not stay their hand and shall spare not, but shall slay you, and shall let fall the sword upon you even until ye shall become extinct.”  –Nephi 3:8

While I can choose to not consent to the mark (the social security number), the BEAST has made it virtually impossible to work, drive, spend money, or live legally without this number within the corporate world of the jurisdiction of the BEAST. And as a corporation of any kind (including that of being a person with a NUMBER), that business must comply with now established state and federal laws to continue to legally do incorporated business in the state, which is within the federal district of The Federal United States (A.K.A. The BEAST). In short, the ability to not consent to this MARK is nullified by the BEAST through the legal code that makes those without the NUMBER unable to support themselves or work without the MARK.

Section 666 of TITLE 42 clearly lays out this authority and jurisdiction. Though the majority of this CODE is referring to paternal suits of child support, it is important to understand that this power can be applied to anyone through such tools as due process and other abusive authorities. To understand the true significance of Section 666, one must understand that through the due process of the BAR Association in the court system, it is the opinion of all courts – municipal or federal (district) – that you do not own your children alone, and that your children are literally owned by the BEAST (the State).

So that there is no doubt of this being true, please review my previous article here:

Do You Own Your Children? –>

Excerpt from this article:

Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108:

Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.

Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.


…When two people decide to get married, they are required to first procure a license from the State. If they have children of this marriage, they are required by the State to submit their children to certain things, such as school attendance and vaccinations. Furthermore, if at some time in the future the couple decides the marriage is not working, they must petition the State for a divorce. Marriage is a three-party contract between the man, the woman, and the State

Linneman v. Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d 48, 50, 116 N.E.2d 182, 183 (1953), citing Van Koten v. Van Koten, 323 Ill. 323, 326, 154 N.E. 146 (1926).

The State represents the public interest in the institution of marriage.”

Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d at 50, 116 N.E.2d at 183 (1953).


This public interest is what allows the State to intervene in certain situations to protect the interests of members of the family.   The State is like a silent partner in the family who is not active in the everyday running of the family but becomes active and exercises its power and authority only when necessary to protect some important interest of family life.”

The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”

Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.


“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”

Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.

Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984).

The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.

Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․

“Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.”

Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).

“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”

Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860).

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ “

Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).


And now that we understand that you are only the delegated third party guardian of State “property” instead of what you thought were your children, we can examine in full Section 666 with the understanding that through marriage contract and the NUMBER as a MARK on all persons – including children – the BEAST has complete control over you and your children and their well-being because they are indeed MARKED with the NUMBER. And the BEAST also has the self-delegated authority to force a person to be guardian of that child through monetary payments – even if that person is never allowed to see that child again. Similar to being put on probation, this judgment for “child support” is used not for the benefit of the child, but for the benefit of the BEAST to contol that person and to justify the stripping of that persons rights (privileges) if he or she does not comply.

Forcing parents to fill out a birth certificate and register their child in the Civil Service and Social Security system is paramount for this claimed legal ownership by the BEAST through due process to have jurisdiction and authority.

Now, let’s read TITLE 42, Section 666…


TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER IV > Part D > § 666 states:

(16) Authority to withhold or suspend licenses.— Procedures under which the State has (and uses in appropriate cases) authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver’s licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational and sporting licenses of individuals owing overdue support or failing, after receiving appropriate notice, to comply with subpoenas or warrants relating to paternity or child support proceedings.


And what does the bible say?

“Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.” -Revelation 13:16-18

“Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheadedwho had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. -Revelation 20:4


And what if an employer chooses not to consent to garnishing the wages of their employees for this corrupt system? Does an employer really have a choice?

Again from: TITLE 42> Chapter 7> SubChapter IV> Part D> Section 666:

(B) Methods must be established by the State to simplify the withholding process for employers to the greatest extent possible, including permitting any employer to combine all withheld amounts into a single payment to each appropriate agency or entity (with the portion thereof which is attributable to each individual employee being separately designated).

(C) The employer must be held liable to the State for any amount which such employer fails to withhold from income due an employee following receipt by such employer of proper notice under subparagraph (A), but such employer shall not be required to vary the normal pay and disbursement cycles in order to comply with this paragraph.

(D) Provision must be made for the imposition of a fine against any employer who

(i) discharges from employment, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against any noncustodial parent subject to income withholding required by this subsection because of the existence of such withholding and the obligations or additional obligations which it imposes upon the employer; or

(ii) fails to withhold support from income or to pay such amounts to the State disbursement unit in accordance with this subsection,

Authors note: This means employers have no right to fire wife-beaters, rapists, or child abusers without heavy fines [taxes]; which ensures the money flows into the Court Registry Investment System [CRIS] accounts to be invested by the for-profit court system.


In the guise of protecting children, Section 666 also states:

(f) Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

In order to satisfy section 654 (20)(A) of this title, on and after January 1, 1998, each State must have in effect the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, as approved by the American Bar Association on February 9, 1993, and as in effect on August 22, 1996, including any amendments officially adopted as of such date by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.

Authors note: The BAR Association is a private corporation, a non-governmental association which represents attorneys, for which government contracts with as the judicial. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the American BAR Association is allowed to force all states to adopt this Act? Do you still believe in states rights?

§ 654a. Automated data processing

(a) In general

In order for a State to meet the requirements of this section, the State agency administering the State program under this part shall have in operation a single statewide automated data processing and information retrieval system which has the capability to perform the tasks specified in this section with the frequency and in the manner required by or under this part.

(b) Program management

The automated system required by this section shall perform such functions as the Secretary may specify relating to management of the State program under this part, including—

(1) controlling and accounting for use of Federal, State, and local funds in carrying out the program; and

(2) maintaining the data necessary to meet Federal reporting requirements under this part on a timely basis.

(3) Use of standardized data elements

Such records shall use standardized data elements for both parents (such as names, social security numbers and other uniform identification numbers, dates of birth, and case identification numbers), and contain such other information (such as on case status) as the Secretary may require.

(4) Liens.— Procedures under which—

(A) liens arise by operation of law (due process) against real and personal property for amounts of overdue support owed by a noncustodial parent who resides or owns property in the State; and

(B) the State accords full faith and credit to liens described in Subparagraph (A) arising in another State, when the State agency, party, or other entity seeking to enforce such a lien complies with the procedural rules relating to recording or serving liens that arise within the State, except that such rules may not require judicial notice or hearing prior to the enforcement of such a lien

(I) No right to jury trial. — Procedures providing that the parties to an action to establish paternity are not entitled to a trial by jury.


One of the fallacies of living in the United States has always been the freedom and autonomy of the individual states. Most citizens believe that if they don’t like the rules and legal codes in one state, they can simply move to another state.

But the individual states are not able to protect their people (citizens) from the criminal court activities of another state, and instead must follow the Uniform Commercial Codes set forth by the BAR and Federal powers, at the threat of losing Federal funds and grants. And under the guise of child protection and caring for the “fatherless”, the following laws are now uniform in all states.


Child Support and Establishment of Paternity. Sec. 666.

Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement. Each State must enact laws requiring the use of the following “procedures” to increase the effectiveness of the program:



The State shall provide procedures which permit the establishment of the paternity of a child. In a contested paternity case [the State shall] require the child and all other parties to submit to genetic tests upon request supported by a sworn statement by the party alleging paternity, and setting forth facts establishing a reasonable possibility of the requisite sexual contact between the parties; or denying paternity, and setting forth facts establishing a reasonable possibility of the nonexistence of sexual contact between the parties. If no objection is made, the test results are admissible as evidence of paternity without the need for other proof of authenticity or accuracy. States must give full faith and credit to a determination of paternity made by any other State. The State procedures shall provide that the parties to an action to establish paternity are not entitled to a trial by jury.



The State shall provide procedures for child support withholding from wages. The wages of an absent parent shall be subject to withholding, regardless of whether support payments are in arrears (guilty until proven innocent). The employer, upon being given notice, is required to withhold wages in the amount specified by the notice and pay such amount to the appropriate agency. The employer must be held liable to the State for any amount which the employer fails to withhold from wages due an employee following receipt of the notice. A fine [shall be] imposed against any employer who discharges from employment, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against any absent parent subject to wage withholding because of the existence of such withholding and the obligations or additional obligations which it imposes upon the employer. The State may withhold from forms of income other than wages regardless of the nature of their income-producing activities. The State must extend its withholding system [to provide for withholding in] cases where the applicable support orders were issued in other States. Any refund of State income tax will be reduced by the amount of any overdue support owed by an absent parent

Author’s note: This explains the real reason the tax system seems so screwed up – forced over-payments of income taxes equal money held for hostage by the IRS for bad behavior… or it equals a refund for good behavior.



[The procedures must assure that] [t]he State has authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver’s licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational licenses of individuals owing overdue support or failing, to comply with subpoenas or warrants relating to paternity or child support proceedings.

Author’s note: With the authority to stop you from driving, working, hunting, gardening, or anything else that requires a license or permission from the State, your compliance to the rules of the State are all but guaranteed. And for those who still wont comply, we now have current and impending legislation allowing for debtor’s prisons.



The State shall have procedures to ensure that all Federal and State agencies conducting activities under this part have access to any system used by the State to locate an individual for purposes relating to motor vehicles or law enforcement. The state shall have procedures requiring that the social security number of: (A) any applicant for a professional license, driver’s license, occupational license, recreational license, or marriage license be recorded on the application; (B) any individual who is subject to a divorce decree, support order, or paternity determination or acknowledgment be placed in the records relating to the matter; and (C) any individual who has died be placed in the records relating to the death and be recorded on the death certificate.



[The State enforcement agency] shall enter into agreements with financial institutions doing business in the State to develop and operate a data match system using automated data exchanges in which each such financial institution is required to provide the name, address, social security number or other identifying information for each noncustodial parent who maintains an account at such institution and who owes past-due support, and will encumber or surrender, as the case may be, assets held by such institution on behalf of the parent. A financial institution shall not be liable under any Federal or State law to any person for any disclosure of information to the State agency; for encumbering or surrendering any assets [under these laws]; or for any other action taken in good faith to comply with the requirements. The State shall periodically report to consumer reporting agencies [credit bureaus] the name [and social security number] of any parent who owes overdue support.


Author’s Note: This system of automated bank withdrawal or withholding will eventually be used to pay everything the State collects, including fines, taxes and any other fees – without your approval. You see… your approval is not needed. Your consent is attained through the voluntary acceptance and use of the NUMBER of the BEAST, for which the BEAST is making it very hard to live without within its jurisdiction.



The State shall establish an automated data collection system (linked database) to include a registry to be known as the ‘State Case Registry’ that contains records with respect to each case in which services are being provided by a State agency. Each [child] support order established or modified in the State on or after October 1, 1998, shall be included in the State Case Registry. [The information in the State Case Registries shall be] furnished to the Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders. The State Case Registry may be established by linking local case registries of [child] support orders through an automated information network. Such records shall use standardized data elements for both parents (such as names, social security numbers and other uniform identification numbers, dates of birth, and case identification numbers), and other information as the Secretary may require. The State agency operating the automated system shall establish, update, maintain, and regularly monitor, case records in the State Case Registry. The State shall use the automated system to extract information (at such times, and in such standardized format or formats, as may be required by the Secretary), to share and compare information with, and to receive information from, other databases and information comparison services, in order to obtain (or provide) information necessary to enable the State agency (or the Secretary or other State or Federal agencies) to carry out this part.



On and after October 1, 1997, each State shall establish an automated directory (to be known as the ‘State Directory of New Hires’) which shall contain information supplied on each newly hired employee in the State. The State will operate a State Directory of New Hires in accordance with section 453A. Each employer shall furnish to the Directory of New Hires of the State in which a newly hired employee works, a report that contains the name, address, and social security number of the employee, and the name and address of the employer.

Author’s note: Eventually, if you have a job in America, you will be on this list. The implementation of Real ID via “E-Verify” will assure this uniformly in all 50 states – and you will not be able to be hired without being “verified” through the MARK of your NUMBER. Child support as used in this section is only one of hundreds of excuses for the implementation of these standards. After all, you could be a terrorist… and potential terrorists must be tracked and watched! And just so that you understand, EVERY PERSON IS A POTENTIAL TERRORIST!!!



The State shall have procedures which give the State [enforcement agency] the authority to take the following actions relating to establishment of paternity or to establishment, modification, or enforcement of support orders, without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other judicial or administrative tribunal, to take the following actions: To subpoena any financial or other information needed to establish, modify, or enforce a support order, and to impose penalties for failure to respond to such a subpoena; To require all entities in the State (including for-profit, nonprofit [including churches], and governmental employers) to provide promptly, in response to a request by the State agency of that or any other State administering a program under this part, information on the employment, compensation, and benefits of any individual employed by such entity as an employee or contractor, and to sanction failure to respond to any such request; To obtain access, subject to safeguards on privacy and information security, and subject to the nonliability of entities that afford such access under this subparagraph, to information contained in the following records (including automated access, in the case of records maintained in automated data bases): (i) Records of other State and local government agencies, including vital statistics (including records of marriage, birth, and divorce); State and local tax and revenue records (including information on residence address, employer, income and assets); records concerning real and titled personal property; records of occupational and professional licenses, and records concerning the ownership and control of corporations, partnerships, and other business entities; employment security records; records of agencies administering public assistance programs; records of the motor vehicle department; and corrections records; (ii) Certain records held by private entities with respect to individuals who owe or are owed support (or against or with respect to whom a support obligation is sought), consisting of the names and addresses of such individuals and the names and addresses of the employers of such individuals, as appearing in customer records of public utilities and cable television companies, pursuant to an administrative subpoena; and. information (including information on assets and liabilities) on such individuals held by financial institutions.

Author’s note: And this explains why it seems like you are trying to access Fort Knox every time you attempt to gain a “service” like cable television or to open a simple checking account. These corporations must comply with the Federal and State requirements to obtain every ounce of information from you as a “customer”, so that future actions as described above can be taken against you through every single part of your day to day life. In short, either conform to government or your life will be shut off and your money and investments seized. Sound familiar?

“Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.” -Revelation 13:16-18

Author’s note: Only a fool would take this passage so literally that they would argue that this can’t be the MARK because it is not on the forehead or the right hand”. The government (the BEAST) operates clandestinely, and so it would not make the MARK so easy to see for the average Social Security Card-carrying citizen. The MARK is the NUMBER…



If the Secretary receives a certification that an individual owes arrearages of child support in an amount exceeding $5,000, the Secretary shall transmit such certification to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of passports, and refuse to issue a passport to such individual, and may revoke, restrict, or limit a passport issued previously to such individual.

Author’s note: Again we see another fallacy shattered in American culture – the “right” to travel can indeed be suspended.



The Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, is authorized to declare any foreign country to be a foreign reciprocating country if the foreign country has established, or undertakes to establish, procedures for the establishment and enforcement of duties of [child] support substantially in conformity with [these laws].

Author’s note: Not only can you not run to other states for protection, but you can not even run to other countries (that is, if you can still obtain a passport). Almost every country in the world is under United Nations control. U.S. and UN treaties and agreements take precedence and authority (jurisdiction) over state and national constitutions. The fallacy and declaration of constitutional rights is laughable to your government, for constitutional rights are interpreted and destroyed by due process, and the BAR Association has the copyright on due process.


Forced Commerce: Health Insurance Required By All Citizens


In one of the latest pushes by the BEAST, government has once again attempted to fool the MARKED citizenry via the implementation a system of “health-care reform”. The most important aspect of this reform is to require the consent of the citizens of the BEAST to obtain health insurance. Similar to requiring participation in the Social Security Old Age Retirement and Disability system itself, the BEAST is now making legislation to require all persons to obtain mandated health insurance. And just like the Social Security investment trust funds, which now stand at over 2.6 trillion in investments, the insurance companies that receive these required payments from all citizens will invest that money in their own funds, while the insured citizens suffer the poorly presented health-care that the BEAST will be regulating.

It is very important to understand while reading this that what is being forced here is not socialism. This is instead what I refer to as forced commerce in a corporatist government – the requirement of the purchase of a service or product at the barrel of a gun – for which the BEAST utilizes and abuses the “interstate commerce clause” through due process by the BAR to force all citizens to purchase health insurance. This is not a tax for socialized or national health care as in other countries, but is instead a requirement to obtain private insurance to cover health care costs (forced commerce). This in no way guarantees that health care will be provided or approved by the insurance companies, nor does it guarantee that a hospital will accept your insurance or you as a patient. Therefore, this is not socialized medicine, but rather the dictatorial requirements of for-profit “forced commerce” in private corporations for the citizenry who carry the MARK and NUMBER of the BEAST.


TITLE 42> Chapter 157> Subchapter V> Part A> § 18091 states the following:

§ 18091 – Requirement To Maintain Minimum Essential Coverage

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) In general

The individual responsibility requirement provided for in this section (in this section referred to as the “requirement”) is commercial and economic in nature, and substantially affects interstate commerce, as a result of the effects described in paragraph (2).

(2) Effects on the national economy and interstate commerce

The effects described in this paragraph are the following:

(A) The requirement regulates activity that is commercial and economic in nature: economic and financial decisions about how and when health care is paid for, and when health insurance is purchased. In the absence of the requirement, some individuals would make an economic and financial decision to forego health insurance coverage and attempt to self-insure, which increases financial risks to households and medical providers.

Author’s Note: This means that the BEAST believes that it is the civic duty that all citizens be required to purchase health insurance that government mandates, and that the BEAST believes that it has final authority in this matter. You do not have a choice, and should not be allowed to self-insure for the betterment of the United Nations, Agenda 21 “social welfare”.

(B) Health insurance and health care services are a significant part of the national economy. National health spending is projected to increase from $2,500,000,000,000, or 17.6 percent of the economy, in 2009 to $4,700,000,000,000 in 2019. Private health insurance spending is projected to be $854,000,000,000 in 2009, and pays for medical supplies, drugs, and equipment that are shipped in interstate commerce. Since most health insurance is sold by national or regional health insurance companies, health insurance is sold in interstate commerce and claims payments flow through interstate commerce.

Author’s Note: Notice that the government recognizes that health care is by far the most profitable industry in the national economy, and measures this fact not in the human suffering that modern health-care causes, but in the profit attained by the symptom management (not the cure) of disease. Medical insurance pays for drugs, supplies, and equipment – not for cures. Thus, this writing should be taken as a deep desire by the BEAST to be in on “the action” of what will surely be around 30% of the entire GDP of the United States by 2019. And remember, government is a major shareholder of all health care and pharmaceutical corporations, and will be very happy with the return on investment obtained from requiring all citizens to obtain health insurance. Of course, no government should own shares in a company that it then regulates the very market for which those companies do business in. This is a major conflict of interest. And this is why this social insurance scheme will offer the worst kind of health care possible. Government will make more profit and dividends from its investments if its investment held insurance companies don’t pay for expensive medical procedures. A smart solution for the people would be to open a statewide-only insurance company, where no interstate commerce is conducted so no Federal Commerce clause interference would be justified. This concept could be applied to all instances of interstate commerce, for inner-state commerce would be regulated only by the state.

(C) The requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will add millions of new consumers to the health insurance market, increasing the supply of, and demand for, health care services, and will increase the number and share of Americans who are insured.

(D) The requirement achieves near-universal coverage by building upon and strengthening the private employer-based health insurance system, which covers 176,000,000 Americans nationwide. In Massachusetts, a similar requirement has strengthened private employer-based coverage: despite the economic downturn, the number of workers offered employer-based coverage has actually increased.

Author’s note: Again we can see that this is not nationalized or socialized health care, but rather forced purchase of insurance. This fuzzy logic makes no provisions for the corruption of the insurance industry or for the ways in which it “manages” health care by denying treatment, services, or medication.

(E) The economy loses up to $207,000,000,000 a year because of the poorer health and shorter lifespan of the uninsured. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will significantly reduce this economic cost.

(F) The cost of providing uncompensated care to the uninsured was $43,000,000,000 in 2008. To pay for this cost, health care providers pass on the cost to private insurers, which pass on the cost to families. This cost-shifting increases family premiums by on average over $1,000 a year. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will lower health insurance premiums.

(G) 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies are caused in part by medical expenses. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will improve financial security for families.

Author’s note: Again, we see that people are being considered by the BEAST here as commodities; as human capital. The BEAST is not concerned that people have poor health or a shorter lifespan, only with the fact that its investment held economy is losing a potential of over $207 billion dollars per year on the “uninsured”. This is literally profit over people. And again this CODE does not stop what is listed in paragraph (F) in any way, referring to medical treatment of people without insurance as “uncompensated care”. For if the private insurance company denies the coverage for an expensive drug or procedure – and they will – there will be just as much liability put on all other citizens to pay for these uncompensated care incidences via their forced insurance payments. Thus, citizens will still be declaring just as many bankruptcies. After all, when faced with obtaining life-saving medical care or the risk of bankruptcy, most people will lose everything to choose to stay alive.

(H) Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and this Act, the Federal Government has a significant role in regulating health insurance. The requirement (forced insurance) is an essential part of this larger regulation of economic activity, and the absence of the requirement (forced insurance) would undercut Federal regulation of the health insurance market.

(I) Under sections 2704 and 2705 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 300gg–3, 300gg–4] (as added by section 1201 of this Act), if there were no requirement, many individuals would wait to purchase health insurance until they needed care. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage, the requirement (forced insurance), together with the other provisions of this Act, will minimize this adverse selection and broaden the health insurance risk pool to include healthy individuals, which will lower health insurance premiums. The requirement (forced insurance) is essential to creating effective health insurance markets in which improved health insurance products that are guaranteed issue and do not exclude coverage of pre-existing conditions can be sold.

Author’s note: By requiring healthy people to obtain health insurance, the people that have been made ill by pharmaceuticals and poor health and diet choices will be able to pump trillions of dollars into the medical industry to keep the cycle of bad medical practices (also regulated and approved by the BEAST) to continue, treating symptoms but not disease for profit, while making a killing off of investing all citizens insurance payments in the stock and security markets via insurance company investment funds.

(J) Administrative costs for private health insurance, which were $90,000,000,000 in 2006, are 26 to 30 percent of premiums in the current individual and small group markets. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage and the size of purchasing pools, which will increase economies of scale, the requirement (forced insurance), together with the other provisions of this Act, will significantly reduce administrative costs and lower health insurance premiums. The requirement is essential to creating effective health insurance markets that do not require underwriting and eliminate its associated administrative costs.

(3) Supreme Court ruling

In United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533 (1944)), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that insurance is interstate commerce subject to Federal regulation.

Again, we see that this act does not improve or regulate health care in any way whatsoever, but refers solely to the administrative costs of the health insurance markets being reduced by forcing citizens to purchase health insurance. In short, this is the “forced commerce” of citizens into the private sector – forcing citizens to buy private insurance against their will. And in the process of regulation and interstate commerce, the BEAST will make the final decision on which insurance companies live or die based on which ones it allows the people to purchase their health insurance from. Do you have a doubt that the auto, life, and other insurance schemes are not soon to follow? After all, you must do what your license to drive forces you to do in order to keep on driving…


The International Social Security Association (ISSA):

For Global Social Security


And last but not least, on to the most important aspect of this grand scheme. In order to understand the true nature of what the MARK and the NUMBER of the BEAST called Social Security is, you must understand that this system is international, and is being implemented on a global scale. And more importantly, it is being promoted and regulated by the United Nations.

For instance, China has a program that is also called the “Social Security System” of China.

You can read about its history from the CATO Institute, here:

Other countries (over 130 of them) have similar social security programs:

Did you know that Kiefer Sutherland’s grandfather introduced universal public health care in Canada?

For those of you familiar with Agenda 21 United Nations sustainable development language, you will no doubt recognize it in this video, produced by the International Social Security Administration (ISSA), and narrated by Mr. Sutherland:

Amazingly, no doubt due to the purposefully induced ignorance of almost the entire global population, this important video (to the whole world) has been online since December of 2010 – and yet it has only received 1,896 views on YouTube. This is a testament to the clandestine work being done in the United Nations, and the massive efforts to direct people’s attention away from it through horrific media entertainment and news soundbites.

We find that the United Nations is very keen on the concept of “Social Security”, and we can see the manifestation of this global desire to implement this “social welfare” and “social justice” program in Article 22 of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which states that:

“Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.”

It is also very important to point out that, according to the official website of the United States Social Security System, the United States is very much a part of the ISSA, with international treaties with many countries:


Since the late 1970′s, the United States has established a network of bilateral Social Security agreements that coordinate the U.S. Social Security program with the comparable programs of other countries. This article gives a brief overview of the agreements and should be of particular interest to multinational companies and to people who work abroad during their careers.

International Social Security agreements, often called “Totalization agreements,” have two main purposes. First, they eliminate dual Social Security taxation, the situation that occurs when a worker from one country works in another country and is required to pay Social Security taxes to both countries on the same earnings. Second, the agreements help fill gaps in benefit protection for workers who have divided their careers between the United States and another country.

Agreements to coordinate Social Security protection across national boundaries have been common in Western Europe for decades. Following is a list of the agreements the United States has concluded and the date of the entry into force of each. Some of these agreements were subsequently revised; the date shown is the date the original agreement entered into force.

Entry into Force
November 1, 1978
December 1, 1979
November 1, 1980
July 1, 1984
July 1, 1984
August 1, 1984
January 1, 1985
January 1, 1987
April 1, 1988
July 1, 1988
August 1, 1989
November 1, 1990
November 1, 1991
November 1, 1992
September 1, 1993
November 1, 1993
September 1, 1994
April 1, 2001
December 1, 2001
October 1, 2002
October 1, 2005
October 1, 2008
January 1, 2009
March 1, 2009

And so we can see that the BEAST has truly laid its MARK on a large part of the world’s population, and that number is increasing with each passing year…

What is the ISSA?

From its website:

Promoting and Developing Social Security Worldwide

The International Social Security Association is the principal international institution bringing together social security agencies and organizations. The ISSA’s aim is to promote dynamic social security as the social dimension in a globalizing world by supporting excellence in social security administration. Founded in 1927, the ISSA has its headquarters at the International Labour Office, in Geneva.

Author’s note: It is important to note here that the original United States Social Security Act was not passed until 1935 – fully 8 years after the ISSA was founded. Hopefully the impact of this realization is as astounding to you as it was to me.

The ISSA provides access to information, expert advice, business standards, practical guidelines and platforms for members to build and promote dynamic social security systems worldwide. The vision of dynamic social security provides a framework for the ISSA’s action.

Dynamic social security refers to social security systems that are accessible, sustainable, adequate, socially inclusive and economically productive, and that are based on performing, well-governed, proactive and innovative social security institutions. In line with the nature of the ISSA as an association of social security institutions, the vision of promoting dynamic social security ties social security improvements to the capacities and performance of these institutions.

This effort is very much supported by the World Bank:

The Social Protection Unit, as part of the Human Development Network, supports the World Bank and client countries to assist individuals, households and communities to better manage the income and welfare risks that affect vulnerable groups. The unit is charged with developing concepts and strategies for Social Protection policy and with carrying out support functions to operational work, largely in the areas of Disability, Labor Markets, Pensions, Safety Nets, and Social Funds. In all these areas, the unit provides operational support to the Regions and leadership for strategy development and results, knowledge management, training, and development of partnerships.

What is the “Human Development Network”?

The Human Development Network is the World Bank’s home for Primary school student in honduraspolicy, programs and research in the fields of Education, Health, Nutrition & Population (HNP), Social Protection & Labor, Children & Youth, HIV/AIDS, and Development Dialogue.Its mission is to assist low and middle income country governments individually and collectively increase the inclusive and efficient investment in people, with a view of driving faster and more equitable growth. The human development network is dedicated to actively participate in global efforts that contribute to poverty reduction through improving access to education, health and social services and to build balanced and competitive societies.

Author’s note: It is personally unsettling to me that this organization, which drives itself on growth and investment capital gains, is also so heavily involved in “HIV/AIDS” and “Nutrition and Population” efforts. One must consider the benefits of population control and of shortening the life expectancy of a global citizenship that is forced to participate in the international Social Security investment funds – especially when those funds don’t pay old-age benefits (liabilities) if the people don’t grow old enough to claim them… or are never born into the system due to population control organizations of the United Nations using forced sterilization through vaccination. In other words, in a system where people become a liability in a for-profit social insurance fund, it is in the best interest of the for-profit fund to not pay its liabilities – by not being required to due to “natural occurrences”.

And just what does the World Bank define as a “Social Fund”?

Social Funds are multi-sectoral programs that finance small projects targeted to benefit a country’s poor and vulnerable groups based on a participatory manner of demand generated by local groups and screened against a set of eligibility criteria.

(Translation: they are investment funds)

Social Fund programs are demand-driven and aim to involve the active participation of several local actors (communities and community-based organizations, NGOs, local governments) with the ultimate goal of addressing the needs of poor and vulnerable communities while contributing to social capital and empowerment at the local level.

Social Funds’ institutional frameworks, targeting, selection criteria, rules for processing projects and contracting vary greatly. Some SFs are fairly centralized, while others work in collaboration with or through local governments; some give funds to community groups for implementation, other to local governments, and others contract third parties on behalf of the communities.

Social Funds are usually managed by a semi-autonomous government body that appraises and supervises the implementation of sub-projects.  In several countries, SFs have served as innovators and demonstrators of new methods of decentralized participatory decision-making, management, and accountability that may be adopted for broader application by public sector organizations.

Social Funds Evolution and Objectives

First generation social funds, launched in the mid to late 1980s, were created to serve as short-term safety nets to soften the impact of structural adjustment policies on the poor. These programs were used in more than 60 countries and aimed at providing emergency relief by creating temporary employment and improving income. These initial programs were assumed to have a short life span.

In recent years, Social Funds have adopted more explicit institutional strategies aimed at empowerment, capacity building, and sustainability goals with a focus on longer-term objectives.  They have played an important role in funding community projects, empowering communities, building linkages between communities and their local governments. More recently, Social Funds have also become valuable instruments in governments’ decentralization processes by giving local governments a greater role in Social Fund sub-project cycles. (Translation: privatization)


So what does this all mean?

Many things, of course. But if you take nothing out of this tome of research, please understand this:

You are the sole beneficiary of your own enslavement through your participation in this system. You have voluntarily taken the MARK of the BEAST by accepting and contracting with the BEAST via your NUMBER in all contracts, both private and public. You have voluntarily submitted your children to the BEAST by voluntarily consenting to the acceptance of the NUMBER to MARK your children as property of the BEAST. And through the use of its demons in its empire called the American BAR Association, you you have no legal recourse to do anything about it…

…Unless you stop participating in the system.

…Unless you withdraw your consent.

…And unless you throw off the NUMBER, which is the MARK of the BEAST.

And remember, God only helps those who help themselves be free.


Like what you just read? Please consider making a donation so that I can keep this up, at:


–Clint Richardson ( –Tuesday, April 24, 2012

You must be logged in to post a comment Login