By Chris Spivey – ccs-rochford.co.uk -
In this article:
SPOT THE PAEDOPHILES
Published below my Narrative is a report taken from the Daily Express. The report is in regard to an interview with former child star Ben Fellows and his claim that the BBC as well as other TV stations and the Theatre world are rife with Paedophiles… The article below however does not go into the full details that were made available to them.
The original article in its entirety has been withdrawn and censored because Ben had named TV Stars and Politicians, still active today whose conduct towards children, especially boys, is not shall we say… How it should be. I believe the article was deliberately censored probably on the orders of the British Government although reliable reports on this are sketchy right now.
You will also see in the Express article, mention of their exclusive interview with Esther Rantzen that the paper ran the day before.
Now, below the Express article is a copy of another article which is published on The ‘alternative news’ website, ‘Before its news’. The article is also written by Ben Fellows in which he is talking about an interview that he gave to the Times. In this article you will see that Ben describes a party he went to when he was 15 at which he was given drugs. Also at the party was someone famous who supposedly has kids best interests at heart yet stood by and watched Ben being given these drugs. The woman he describes can only be Esther Rantzen. Therefore, it would have been a conflict of interest for the Express to reveal that information.
I also believe that the article on the Before its News website, had either left in the name of a TV star or the names of three Prominent Politicians whom Ben named in the Times interview. However, as you will see, ‘Before Its News’ has now also been ordered by the government to Censor the article.
With regard to the Times Newspaper who conducted an interview with Ben; they apparently told him that they intended to run the interview in its entirety. However, one of the actors named in that interview is now appearing on SKY TV, who apparently have a lot invested in him. Since the Times and Sky are both owned by Rupert Murdoch, to name the star would be a conflict of interest . In the end, the Times pulled the interview altogether, although I understand a very heavily censored and watered down version may be in today’s or tomorrows edition.
So, what we basically have is the media and politicians covering up for Paedophiles, in order to protect their ‘interests’. I have been saying all along that these Paedophiles names are already known – no investigation needed really. I have also said that the ‘powers that be’ are intentionally keeping the attention focused on Savile and the BBC, in order to keep peoples eyes off where the real Paedophiles are, namely the Government and the Royal family.
Never the less, this news is slowly getting out as you are about to see. Below the Before its News article is another article written by Ben Fellows which is published on The Sovereign Independent website. Although the Sky TV star is not named in this article, the 3 Politicians are, the most prominent of whom is Kenneth Clarke. Interestingly enough Clarke is supposedly the man who sanctioned the Broadmoor Board of Directors to be sacked, a move that enabled Jimmy Savile to get the keys to the door, so to speak.
Also named with Clarke is the Government Lobbyist Ian Greer. Now either this is an awful coincidence or the dots are beginning to connect because I named Ian Greer as being deeply embroiled in paedophilia in an article I published on here 3 weeks ago http://www.ccs-rochford.co.uk/spivey/?p=6251
Below the Sovereign Independent article is a You Tube link to the Ben Fellows radio show. On that show Dominique Strauss-Kahn the ex IMF chief is named as being at the head of a European Paedophile ring. The vile little man has long been known as a sex pest.
Below that is another You tube video link to a Bill Maloney video. In it Maloney takes to a microphone and loudly announces that he can testify that the Queen Mother was a Paedophile who sexually abused little girls. This of course all ties in with what I say in my article Monsters Inc :http://www.ccs-rochford.co.uk/spivey/?p=3786
Below that… Nah, I’m only joking… Only the Government could go that low. I wonder if I will get a Government Warning.
Until that time, happy reading.
A FORMER child actor revealed how he “ran a gauntlet of paedophiles” at the BBC, claiming the entertainment industry was rife with sex abuse.
Ben Fellows, who appeared in Eastenders, The Bill and Starlight Express before becoming an award-winning filmmaker, spoke last night about how he was preyed upon by actors, directors and producers. Mr Fellows’s testimony will pile more pressure on the BBC in the wake of the Jimmy Savile sex scandal.He said: “Once I’d entered the entertainment industry proper I ran a gauntlet of paedophiles – both at the BBC and other television production companies and also in theatres, as well as commercial photo shoots.“In fact, almost every production I was involved with I was targeted in some way or another.”Mr Fellows, 38, who trained at the Royal Shakespeare Company, claims that as a teenager he was asked totake his top off and pose for photographs before being propositioned by men and women “all the time”.On one occasion, he claims, he was chased around a dressing room by a naked actor at the Theatre Royal in London’s West End. Mr Fellows’s graphic account of life as an aspiring actor is the latest in a series of revelations to emerge after 60 women alleged Savile had raped or indecently assaulted them – some in the late DJ’s BBC dressing room.The BBC’s director-general George Entwistle has promised an independent investigation into practices at thecorporation in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.However, Mr Fellows’s account of life as a child star appears to indicate that predatory behaviour was commonplace far more recently.He said: “The truth is there are paedophiles everywhere in the entertainment industry.”Last night children’s campaigner Esther Rantzen received support from Mark Wood, chairman of trustees for NSPCC and ChildLine, after it was claimed she was told about Jimmy Savile 18 years ago but failed to act.Yesterday the Daily Express published an exclusive interview with Ms Rantzen in which she said the Savile sex scandal could undermine her “life’s work” protecting children.Mr Wood said: “Very few people have done so much for vulnerable children. In my view she is irreplaceable.”—————————————————————————————————————–
“The Times wanted names of BBC paedophiles but not the ones I gave them!” – Ben Fellows
The Jimmy Savile paedophile ring at the centre of the BBC has taken an interesting twist this week as this journalist has come to realise that accusations of child abuse and paedophilia only extend to the deceased. If you’re a living, breathing human being in the entertainment industry mainstream media won’t expose you. If you are a paedophile or child abuser in the entertainment industry and are famous or powerful you can breath a sigh of relief – you won’t be exposed, at least not by the Murdoch empire.
It all started when I was contacted by Ruth Lewy from The Times newspaper on October 16th 2012. She wanted me to do an exclusive interview about my experiences as a child actor when I had run the gauntlet of paedophiles in the entertainment industry. She wanted to “give this a great showing” but she would also “want to be the only people you speak to until it appears in print this weekend.” All I asked for in return for giving The Times an exclusive was that the story would definitely run. She agreed to the terms and said that senior Times journalist Jack Malvern would interview me and a photographer would take some pictures of me for the article, which would appear on Saturday the 20thOctober 2012. So we arranged a time and a place to meet.
Jack Malvern a tall, balding ex-public school boy complete with the uniform of his generation was late to the meeting. When he did eventually arrive he had to go shopping for a new pad! When he did eventually arrive proper, he sat down in front of me at the Novotel in Greenwich and asked me specifically to name names of people who, I alleged, were suspected paedophiles or had abused me in some way while I was a minor.
For the next two hours I sat in the Novotel being interviewed intensely and having only one cup of tea. The deal was that I was happy to name alleged paedophiles and child abusers in the wider industry, based on my own experiences but the story had to run.
What was good about the article, I thought, was that The Times were going to be brave and publish the names of actual living breathing people, rather than dead people like Jimmy Savile or Wilfred Brambell. Famous and powerful people who could argue back, perhaps call me a liar or fantasist in an attempt to clear their name.
I talked about a senior female BBC producer who likes to have sex with teenagers. Or I should say have sex with me when I was a teenager. I continued with a long list of names of extremely well known actors, casting directors, producers, directors, writers and executives who had all abused me or attempted to abuse me sexually while I was a child actor.
I explained to Jack Malvern of The Times, that I only ever had sexual relations with women however that didn’t stop predatory gay men from attempting to get into my pants. As a child actor you are not responsible for your actions, you’re naïve, vulnerable and quite frankly an idiot, well I was. So, saying no when powerful industry people are telling you to take drugs with the implication that if you don’t – you won’t be hanging around for long, is highly unlikely. It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book and works really on children, now add sex, money and power into the mix and you’re lucky if you don’t spend life after being a child actor in rehab and therapy – of course some do.
Ben Fellows aged 15 with his mom
So, from the age of 15 I was a regular at Stringfellows, Cafe De Paris and The Atlantic Bar and Grill. I attended many celebrities parties and private functions.
One party was in a house in the New Forest and I must have been around sixteen at the time. At the party was a certain founder of a child protection telephone charity. I was given drugs, alcohol and was propositioned by men and women all night until I ended up passed out in the garden. I eventually got a cab back to my digs in a terrible state. You’d think that for someone who is known for their charitable works protecting children she might insist that this party was for adults only and make me go home or at least keep an eye on me and stop me from drinking – recognising the fact that I looked and was very young. (Esther Rantzen then – Spivey)
For consenting adults there is nothing wrong with sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. However, I was a teenager and was being introduced to a very murky world by so called “respectable” industry figures and celebrities.
Now, none of my story seemed to be a problem for Jack Malvern when he interviewed me, he was happy to publish what I said. After the interview I even checked to see if he was happy with what I said. The only issue was that later in the day he wanted to interview my mother about an incident when I was called into a casting for a major drinks company. I gave him my mother’s telephone number, he left two messages which she ignored as she didn’t want to talk to him. My mother never agreed to talk to Jack Malvern which is what I told him when I later informed him that she didn’t want to be interviewed as she’s a very private person and it was her choice. Jack Malvern didn’t seem to think it was an issue and left me with the impression that the article would run as planned on Saturday 20th October 2012.
Of course printed here are just a few stories of the many that I told him. He’d asked for names and I’d given them to him with details only one who was there would know. He even empathised at one point and told me that my story rang true for him as he’d experienced similar problems with predatory gay men when he was a young journalist or so he told me.
Little did I know that the next BBC person I named was the one that would stop the article from coming out. The person who I am referring to shall remain nameless in this article, however they are a new star of Sky Television. It seems that Sky have a lot invested in this person and like the BBC stopping the Jimmy Savile Newsnight programme Murdoch et al. have withdrawn an explosive article in The Times that threatened to reveal a far seedier side of their new star than they would like. Drug taking, inappropriate sexual behaviour and child abuse isn’t something the Murdoch empire want revealed.
Now, Jack Malvern of The Times may say that I’m an unreliable person or that they couldn’t corroborate the accusations I was making. But isn’t that what child abuse is all about? There are laws preventing people from making false allegations so why would I lie. In any case they said they’d run the article either with or without the names. So, why didn’t it run? My theory is that they didn’t want to give me the platform of appearing in The Times, just in case I mentioned names at a later date.
The Murdoch empire and BBC are clearly safe havens for child abusers to operate.
A society that takes the position of not believing victims, hiding the truth and protecting abusers for their own personal gain is a sad state of affairs. It is typical of a society gone mad, set up to procure children and to protect paedophiles. In other words children’s well being comes down to simply politics. If you accuse someone of abuse and they happen to be famous or powerful then tough luck you lose. You won’t be believed, regardless of the validity of your claims by either the state or mainstream corporate media seems to be the message.
The irony is that the Murdoch empire, who has always been quick to name and shame is curiously reluctant when it comes to naming one of its own stars. It appears that the empire is only prepared to expose child abusers and paedophiles as long as it doesn’t affect its own reputation.
We’ve moved on from just phone hacking…
One of News International’s slogans on their Website is “We’re delivering more news, to more people, more often, in more ways than ever”. If the Murdoch press is willing to deny the public vital information which is in their interest to know, like exposing paedophiles and child abusers, then the question has to be – Are News International’s titles worth the paper they’re written on? Or more importantly are the Murdoch’s responsible enough to run a media empire influencing millions of people all around the world. If they’re hiding child abuse then the answer is no.